Prospective randomized comparison of impedance-controlled auto-continuous positive airway pressure (APAPFOT) with constant CPAP

WJ Randerath, W Galetke, M David, H Siebrecht… - Sleep medicine, 2001 - Elsevier
WJ Randerath, W Galetke, M David, H Siebrecht, B Sanner, KH Rühle
Sleep medicine, 2001Elsevier
Background: The measurement of impedance permits reliable detection of obstructive
apneas, hypopneas and upper airways resistance syndrome. Objective: To establish
whether impedance-controlled self-adjusting positive airway pressure therapy (APAPFOT) is
equally as good as constant continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in the treatment of
sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). Methods: Twenty men and five women with OSAS (age
52.8±9.0 years, body mass index (BMI) 31.4±5.0 kg/m2, AHI 32.2±18.1/h (mean±SD)) …
Background
The measurement of impedance permits reliable detection of obstructive apneas, hypopneas and upper airways resistance syndrome.
Objective
To establish whether impedance-controlled self-adjusting positive airway pressure therapy (APAPFOT) is equally as good as constant continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in the treatment of sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS).
Methods
Twenty men and five women with OSAS (age 52.8±9.0 years, body mass index (BMI) 31.4±5.0 kg/m2, AHI 32.2±18.1/h (mean±SD)) underwent baseline polysomnography, manual CPAP titration and two nights of treatment, one with APAPFOT, one with constant CPAP.
Results
With both modes, a significant reduction in respiratory disturbances was seen (apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) baseline 32.2±18.1/h, constant CPAP 6.6±8.7, APAPFOT 5.5±3.8/h, P<0.001 baseline vs. each treatment mode). Under APAPFOT, the sleep profile was normalized (S3/4 baseline 16.3±13.9% total sleep time (TST), APAPFOT 21.6±10.9% TST, P<0.05, rapid eye movement (REM) 14.2±6.7% TST vs. 20.3±7.3% TST, P<0.01), while with constant CPAP, a tendency towards improvement was found. The mean treatment pressure with APAPFOT was significantly lower than the constant CPAP (5.7±2.1 vs. 8.3±1.6 mbar, P<0.001).
Conclusion
We conclude that APAPFOT is at least as effective as constant CPAP in normalizing sleep and breathing in OSAS.
Elsevier
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果